|
'AUStango' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Summer Song is a really special rose in a rare colour. That said, I really hate these secretive "seedling x seedling" statements. Mr Austin did not invent roses, he built upon the works of others, who themselves have been building upon the works of others for generations. Nobody can make me believe Mr Austin got Summer Song as a chance seedling with unknown parentage. By not disclosing the parentage, he wants to prevent others from going down the same road in hybridising. Of course it's not only an Austin phenomenon, and part of my argument is vain because I can use Summer Song itself in hybridising, but I still find this kind of non-disclosure irritating to say the least.
|
REPLY
|
It would be fun to guess the parentage. I grow two own-root Pat Austin with shiny & glossy foliage, and I can see some Pat Austin in pictures of Summer Song's leaves. Pat is a water-hog and can't take full-sun & best in 4 hours of morning sun. Pat Austin has a mango scent (like Summer Song). Another rose that might be in Summer Song's parentage is Geranium Red (amazing scent & many petals, but wimpy). The glossy-foliage like Summer Song and Pat Austin need alkaline minerals & shade and constant wetness more than others, in my experience of growing 110+ OWN-ROOT roses.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
17 DEC by
jmile
I got my first Summer Song this year. We get very hot in the Summer in Zone 9B so I put it where it only got sun half day. It grew very listlessly. It produced some flowers but not much----so I moved it into full sun and heat----It loved it. It perked up and sent out new growth. I didn't water it a lot either---- it was adapt or die and it chose to adapt and it is looking a lot better. I am hoping that next year will be even a better year in full sun and hot weather. I got two more young plants this Fall so I will experiment. Maybe graft it onto Fortuniana to see how that goes.
|
REPLY
|
The habit of not disclosing parentage is particularly annoying for us who garden in difficult climates because it prevents us from studying lineages to help us determine whether a cultivar can thrive in our climate and soil conditions. It does help a little to know in which of his five categories Austin places his roses, but even that information is not always or often included in nursery descriptions.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
16 NOV 16 by
JM3
This is no longer for sale in the US, buy I'm willing to pay for a cutting. Does it perform reasonably on its own roots?
|
REPLY
|
Sometimes sold on Etsy for way overprice.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
3 DEC by
Lee H.
I’m beginning to believe that one can make a tidy side hustle with discontinued Austin roses. Same story with Jude the Obscure.
It’s only overpriced if you can’t find willing buyers…
|
REPLY
|
They seem to be quite the status symbol in some quarters. I wonder if the DA company will not live to regret its' aggressive culling policy.
|
REPLY
|
lol, I hope you live long enough to see that! They have been culling better roses for poorer roses since their early days, sometimes just to replace a pink rose on the market without patent protection with one that did get patented.
|
REPLY
|
Ding ding ding. Watch what Star does now that the KO patents will start to wane.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Sometimes this rose smells very strong, other times hardly anything at all. It does not seem to matter on the age of the bloom or weather conditions or time of day it randomly gives my nose all or nothing. When it does fickley decide to realise some fragrance it is truly ravishing.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
4 JAN 16 by
Poesie
Hello,
Just first 79-13-01 is completed, others are empty. http://www.helpmefind.com/gardening/l.php?l=2.41087&tab=21&lstTyp=256 Please if you delete empty descendants.
Poesie
|
REPLY
|
|