|
|
List customization using the above LIST OPTIONS feature is an advanced feature available to premium-membership members and sponsor listings.
|
40 years old and obsolete as this one may be, as mutable as the color can be, it isn't and never will be o-r as remains the classification. OP is a slam dunk. OB or PB would be more appropriate than OR. Here is a pic from the 1977 Jackson & Perkins catalog.
Uploaded 24 JAN 16 |
Page from the Jackson & Perkins catalog, 1977. Actually a rather accurate representation of this one. If possible, read the description! In the 70's it was all about exhibition and no, this one sure is NOT exhibition! They tried to explain it but to no avail, this one was a flop upon release.
Uploaded 24 JAN 16 |
|
From the 1977 Jackson & Perkins catalog.
Uploaded 24 JAN 16 |
C
10/22/15, Columbus, OH. Color is tough to describe and nearly impossible to capture on film: deep, velvety red undershot with orange. The orange is apparent in this picture, bloom a little tattered from recent heavy winds. The foliage is some of the most glossy, shiny foliage I have ever seen, definitely inherited from 'All That Jazz.'
Uploaded 22 OCT 15 |
|
Page from the 1977 Jackson & Perkins catalog. Although the description mentions the unique color---and it is, bright salt water taffy pink---the photo makes this one look coral? Too bad the actual unique color could not have been captured because there is no doubt that is why this one was released.
Uploaded 24 JAN 16 |
V
10/22/15 in Columbus, OH.
1 favorite vote.
Uploaded 22 OCT 15 |
|
C,V
Page from the 1977 Jackson & Perkins catalog. While Tampico's pic in the catalog is quite accurate, I don't Futura's is! Futura is a little short on petals and at least in my experience leans a little flat-star shaped. Not at all rounded as in the pic.
1 favorite vote.
Uploaded 24 JAN 16 |
10/22/15 in Columbus, OH.
Uploaded 22 OCT 15 |
| C - Member Comments | I - Accuracy Questioned | R - Member Ratings | V - Member Favorite |
|
