HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Search PostsPosts By CategoryRecent Posts 
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post yesterday by happymaryellen
I planted my new dawn in March 2016. It has grown like crazy! Last year in spring I got a full flush of blooms. This year I got a full flush blooms in spring. But it doesn’t seem to continue blooming. I am deadheading it, and doing so properly down to five leaves. I also have gotten a Normas amount of growth coming off of it, it’s extremely leggy. So the question I have is, is it too soon for me to expect to bloom all season long?
It is extremely healthy and happy and green, almost no disease, just a little bit of mildew lately. I live in Northern California I am in 100% full sun, and I’ve been fertilizing every three weeks with Max sea 16 1616 Any thoughts?
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted today by Lavenderlace
I have only been getting a big spring flush also! I've had several people tell me that they might have reverted back to Dr. W. Van Fleet. But I have a total of 16 from two vendors so that seems like a lot to all revert back. I'm very curious to see if this fall will have any blooms from the second vendor's, which are younger.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted today by Andrew from Dolton
There is usually a good spring flush here then another scat of flower from August into September. This year was unusually hot and dry and so far there have been no second flush although it has put on plenty of new growth. Maybe extra watering could be the answer.
REPLY
most recent today SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 19 NOV 13 by Amy's Idaho Rose Garden
I also did research on Simsalabim. I have wanted it forever and could never get my hands on it.
The word is Scandinavian in origin. Appeared in a America in the 1900 used in a magic show, by a magician named Dante.
And yes Sim Sala Bim = Abracadabra.

Funny I had some thought about how much Simsalabim pictures looked like my Abracadabra!
Thank you Kim for bringing this up.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 9 posted 23 JUN by Xoan Mos
Hi,
I am looking for a rose called abracadabra.
Can anyone point me to where I can get a cutting???
Much appreciated,
REPLY
Reply #2 of 9 posted 23 JUN by AzRoseLady
I do not know about a cutting. You can buy a rooted plant from forloveofroses.com
REPLY
Reply #3 of 9 posted 24 JUN by Xoan Mos
AzRose Lady,
Thank you so much for this its really helpful.
I visited the site and found similar roses but I couldn't find the Abracadabra.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 9 posted 24 JUN by AzRoseLady
It is under Floribunda. That is its current classification.
https://forloveofroses.com/product-category/floribunda-roses/
REPLY
Reply #5 of 9 posted 25 JUN by Xoan Mos
Thanks a million.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 9 posted 2 JUL by Jonathan Windham
Roses Unlimited also has 'Abracadabra'

https://rosesunlimitedsc.com/2016/12/12/florib/
REPLY
Reply #7 of 9 posted 2 JUL by Xoan Mos
Thank you so much. I will give it a try.
Thank you for your help.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 9 posted today by Xoan Mos
Hi all,
The roses I bought a while back are now giving nice roses. The colors are great, I've never seen anything like that before (Abracadabra).
The one thing I didn't know was the size of the roses, they are tiny. I am a bit disappointed about that.
Can you guys refer me to a place where I can get the Abracadabra roses??
But, bigger size, normal size I would say. The ones I have are like inch and a half across, at the most.
Thanks in advance,
REPLY
Reply #9 of 9 posted today by AzRoseLady
I love Abracadabra. She has the most amazing colors. Unfortunately, the size you are describing is normal for this rose. She was re-classified as a floribunda for this reason.. Just enjoy her as she is!!
REPLY
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post yesterday by CybeRose
Rose Listing Omission

Rosa microcarpa Retz.

A. J. Retzius in Phytographische Blätter pp. 40-41 (1803)
ROSA microcarpa caule petiolisque aculeatis, calycibus integerrimis glandulosis, pedunculis inermibus, germinibus ovatis nudis,
Radix haud repens.
Caules quinquepedales, stricti, aculeati. 
Aculei recurvi substipulares et sparsi.
Petioli subtus dense aculeati, subvillosi, stipulis minutis serrulatis glandulosis.
Folia septena foliolis undique serrulatis, supra rugosa, subtus villosula, ovata.
Pedunculi tri-quadriflori, mudi, inermes,
Bractea sub quovis pedicello ovato-acuminata , serrulato-glandulosa, rarius trifida.
Pedicelli nudi, gabri, bibracteati, bracteis latis acuminatis.
Germen ovato-oblongum, nudum, glabrum.
Calycina folia parce glandulis pedicellatis aspersa, integerrima, petalis breviora, tribus apice parum dilatatis.
Petala rosea , sere biloba, grate odora. 
Fructus ruber, parvus, ovato-oblongus, colo angustato.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted today by jedmar
This is also a synonym of Rosa cymosa Tratt.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted today by CybeRose
Jedmar,
Retzius had a different species in mind. Trattinnick (1823) thought it was a form of R. canina: "b) R. microcarpa Retz, sorte nil nisi canina?"

Rosa microcarpa Lindl. = R. cymosa Tratt.
Karl
REPLY
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post today by 16-Eichen-Rosenschätze
The correct spelling is "Malabarista". In Spanish language Malabarista is the vagrant of the Middle Ages who juggels, basically a "Jongleur".
REPLY
© 2018 HelpMeFind.com